【Hindi Dubbed Archives】

There are Hindi Dubbed Archivesthree reasons why Apple's AirPods are considered the best true wireless earbuds you can buy: They're small, pair really easily to iOS devices, and only cost $159.

Everyone from Samsung to Jaybird to Bose have their own alternatives, but they cost even more. $159 for AirPods is a great price, but Crazy Baby, the company behind that crazy Mars levitating Bluetooth speaker, thinks it can offer even better sound for an even lower $99.

SEE ALSO: Google Pixel Buds review: They're great... if you own a Pixel phone

You may not have heard about Crazy Baby, but they've actually got some experience building true wireless earbuds.

The startup launched its first true wireless earbuds, the Air, last year on Indiegogo, and it was an immediate hit. It racked up over $2.7 million in crowdfunding, smashing its goal by 5,513 percent.

The $169 wireless earbuds were praised for their great Hi-Fi sound quality and small size. The new Air Nano promises the same sound for only $99.

Not only that, but the Air Nano will come in 10 different colors to really cater to a more price-conscious demographic.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

I had never tried the Air earbuds before, so I set my expectations accordingly. When the company brought the earbuds over to our office, I was expecting budget sound.

However, after listening to the both the Air and the Air Nano, I was pleasantly impressed by how similar the audio quality was despite the newer bud's smaller bullet-like size and design.

The splash-proof wireless earbuds use the original Air's same CSR chip to deliver great sound. I'm not sure exactly what this marketing speak is, but I can tell you they sounded better than my AirPods. There's more bass and a little more separation between the mids and highs.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

I only had a brief listen so I can't say how well they "burn in" over time or even how well they isolate external sound while on the loud subway, but at least the fit is tight and comfortable. There's no getting around the fact they look like bullets in your ears like the Erato Apollo 7's I reviewed last year.

Battery life appears to be on the weak side, though. The earbuds themselves last for 3 hours of music listening on a single charge, which is less than the 5 hours you get from AirPods and Google's Pixel Buds. The case gives you another four extra charges for an additional 12 hours of battery life.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

At the very least, they charge up fast. Five minutes of charging in the case gets you 1.5 hours of music listening.

The era of true wireless earbuds is here and products like the Air Nanos will drive costs down until they're affordable for everyone. The question is, at what point does the balance between sound and price mean an inferior audio experience? Who knows, but for now, we're just happy someone's making good-sounding wireless earbuds that cost $99, because not everyone can afford to drop more on them.

Air Nano is currently funding on Indiegogo and has already surpassed its goal, receiving over $219,000 as of this writing. If it beats the original Air wireless earbuds at the end of its crowdfunding, this might be a brand to keep an eye on.

---

Featured Video For You

---

Google's Pixel 2 and 2 XL are perfect if you don't want to spend $1,000 on a new phone

---

Topics Gadgets

• Games
• Deals
• Digital Culture
• Social Good
• Life
• Tech
• Shopping
• Science

• We'll always, er, sorta, have the Paris Climate Agreement
• James Salter Wins the 2010 Rea Award by The Paris Review
• Ted Cruz and Ron Perlman are in a strange Twitter fight about ... wrestling?
• Staff Picks: Microstyle, The Epiplectic Bicycle by The Paris Review
• AC Milan vs. Feyenoord 2025 livestream: Watch Champions League for free
• Polaroids by Misty Woodford
• It’s About to Get Really Girly by The Paris Review
• On the Shelf by Sadie Stein
• Optogenetics: A Virtual Reality System for Controlling Living Cells
• 21 of the best and worst celebrity homes, as seen on Zoom calls

• Genius stoner snack sparks weed Twitter to share its best munchies recipes
• Everything coming to HBO Max in November 2020
• In defense of being a Boyfriend Girl online
• Why NASA is bringing some of this asteroid back to Earth
• Republicans vote to subpoena Facebook, Twitter CEOs in the wake of Hunter Biden story
• Halloween is a great time to explore wild kinks and BDSM role
• Trump only wants positive news about him, thanks
• Everything coming to Hulu in November 2020
• 'Fast and Furious' franchise will cross the finish line with 11th film
• How to stream the final presidential debate

• Clean energy projects soared in 2016 as solar and wind got cheaper
• Elon Musk says verified Twitter accounts are now prioritized, whatever that means
• Southern Gothic by Margaret Eby
• Twitter search is now only available to registered users
• E3 2017 Trailer Roundup: Upcoming PC Games
• 21 of the best and worst celebrity homes, as seen on Zoom calls
• Texas Forever by Adam Wilson
• Chris D'Elia and the rise of Twitter as a platform to call out sexual predators
• Even Trump's Earth Day message was anti
• Cathy Park Hong on 'Engine Empire' by Robyn Creswell

• Then and Now: 5 Generations of GeForce Graphics Compared
• Frida’s Corsets by Leslie Jamison
• 'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for April 26
• Writing Jobs; Literary Style Icons by Sadie Stein
• 11 Tech Products That Were Supposed to Fail... But Didn't
• The Angel of Forgetfulness by Tracy Daugherty
• Charge 4 vs. Vivosmart 4: Which fitness tracker is right for you?
• Staff Picks: Microstyle, The Epiplectic Bicycle by The Paris Review
• Best Amazon deal: Save 20% on floral and botanical Lego sets
• Apple AI health coach plans: What we know so far.